Il Forum ufficiale di Tuttowrestling.com
https://www.tuttowrestling.com/phpbb/
Daniels non per molto: fuori tutti gli over 40 tranne Angle a fare il Terry Funk del terzo millennio, impostazione super sportiva tipo ROH degli inizi se non di più, ricerca della solita trinità su cui far ruotare il ME (suo grandd classico)The Headliner ha scritto: ↑14/06/2020, 8:34 Che piani aveva per la Tna?Sono mai usciti fuori?
Sono strasicuro che avrebbe pushato Daniels e Styles nella stratosfera
E la ROH degli inizi era heymaniana essendo Sapolsky allievo e ispirato da, non a caso il primo ME fu un Three Way Dance.Darth_Dario ha scritto: ↑14/06/2020, 10:43 Daniels non per molto: fuori tutti gli over 40 tranne Angle a fare il Terry Funk del terzo millennio, impostazione super sportiva tipo ROH degli inizi se non di più, ricerca della solita trinità su cui far ruotare il ME (suo grandd classico)
Jeff Hardy 18 ha scritto: ↑13/06/2020, 19:55 Comunque Heyman ha fatto un buon lavoro in un anno. Per dire Reigns/Bryan fu ben fatto.
Ricochet o Drew li hanno costruiti abbastanza bene.
Oppure Rollins.
Il problema era comunque altro. Ma alla fin fine mi viene da dire sia stato un discreto lavoro.
Rovert’s report reads: “I’ve heard a couple of versions of the story but it is all basically the same thing. AJ Styles had a horrible time on Raw. Him and Heyman didn’t get along & he couldn’t handle the banter as the locker room would make fun of him and his politics/conspiracy theories.”
Meltzer wrote: “Actually the reason was that he was furious that Gallows & Anderson were fired. Blamed Heyman. Classic case of JR/JJ/Laurinaitis syndrome. Vince is the one who made the decision but I suppose he felt Heyman could have fought him on it. So he wanted to go to the side where the guy in charge isn’t fighting Vince on something like that either.”
Di quello se ne parla fin da quando ritornò nel 2014 in WWE mi pare, poi con la presidenza Trump tale ipotesi sembra diventare sempre più forte.(perchè Fondamentalmente se ci è riuscito lui, può riuscirci chiunque).PuroIndyLove ha scritto: ↑15/06/2020, 17:53 Ho letto di un interessamento di The Rock alla politica.
Madò, voglio la Nation of Domination Party!
Ron Simmons alle relazioni coi media subito!
The WON maintains that Heyman’s departure from creative was, as previously noted, not due to any backstage blow-up between him and someone else but rather a philosophical change around how to book the show. As had been noted, Heyman was rebuilding Raw around creating new stars he saw as having potential including Humberto Carrillo, Andrade, Buddy Murphy, Aleister Black, and Zelina Vega. The site notes that USA Network was on board with Heyman’s changes in direction as they were convinced that new blood was needed due to a largely aging roster in the main event. Executives at USA Network didn’t find out about the change to Prichard until shortly before everyone else did and were not happy about it.
Of course, the show’s ultimate creative direction was from Vince McMahon and that will remain the same. Prichard is a guy who can present shows and ideas that he knows McMahon will like, while Heyman was trying to build his own crew and trying to keep the casualties minimized when McMahon would lose interest in newer talent. It was believed by many in the company that Heyman’s days were numbered as far back as a few weeks ago, as McMahon didn’t see what Heyman saw in some characters while the ratings patterns were not backing up his efforts.
As of now it is not clear what Heyman’s removal will mean for talent that has been given a new spotlight. Most of the talent that Heyman was pushing are said to be nervous, as it will quickly be obvious who McMahon is behind and who isn’t. Shayna Baszler had been taken off TV by McMahon weeks ago and the fate of the rest of the talent remains to be seen. Raw had a different feel this week, and it ended up having a good number. Black, Carrillo and Baszler were not on the show, though Baszler had been off for a while and all of their absence from one show doesn’t mean much.